INTRODUCTION
Students are not machines. And students using machines not machines using students should be the aim of our teaching. Teachers are not machines, either. Teachers use machines to write with. We have not been taught by machines to write, but we do use machines to help us to write better. Such a machine is the computer, and writing better is something the computer can help us to do. Why? It helps because writing well, especially the kind of writing demanded by schools, means re-writing. Genuine re-writing means re-vision, re-seeing the ideas that find their expression on the page. Previous technology allowed us to re-see what we had written, but the technology represented by the computer allows us easily to re-see and to see again through re-writing the ideas that we have re-visioned. Teachers use machines this way; why should teachers teach students to use them differently?
Many of the ideas that we have revised find their expression in new sentence forms: more complex sentences often indicate more complex thought. Certainly, through the process of re-writing, our sentences can become more beautiful. And complexity and beauty are often convincing, often as persuasive as the force of our ideas, their logical expression, and their supporting details. Often we are drawn to a writer not because we agree with the writer's ideas but because of the writer's style. Like so much in life, beauty is more compelling than utility.
It is my belief that it is style more than anything else that attracts us to a writer. Whether or not you share my belief, I think you will find that completing these ten exercises will give you an increased appreciation for sentence style and that many of these writing exercises will help you express your ideas in a form that readers will find attractive.
Any technology presents to humans two distinct "faces." We can view the computer as a threat or a liberation. We can use the computer to re-enforce bad teaching or to promote good teaching. Using the computer to take over the punitive, judgmental functions that label, categorize, and separate the "good" students from the "bad" is simply to increase oppression for students and remove students from the utilization of writing as communication of what matters in a manner that appeals to the readers' better instincts.
Return to the Preface
Go to Introductory Note on Sentence Style
Go to Exercise One
Return to Table of Contents
Return to Joe Napora's Homepage